Health
The influence of lumbo-sacral transitional vertebrae in developmental dysplasia of the hip: a matched pair analysis
Fujii, M., Nakashima, Y., Sato, T., Akiyama, M. & Iwamoto, Y. Pelvic deformity influences acetabular version and coverage in hip dysplasia. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 469, 1735–1742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1746-1 (2011).
Haffer, H. et al. Changes of fixed anatomical spinopelvic parameter in patients with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: A matched pair analysis. Diagnostics (Basel) 11, 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11010059 (2021).
Tönnis, P. D. D. in Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Loder, R. T. & Skopelja, E. N. The epidemiology and demographics of hip dysplasia. ISRN Orthop. 2011, 238607. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/238607 (2011).
Ganz, R. & Leunig, M. Morphological variations of residual hip dysplasia in the adult. Hip Int. 17(Suppl 5), S22-28 (2007).
Jacobsen, S. & Sonne-Holm, S. Hip dysplasia: A significant risk factor for the development of hip osteoarthritis. A cross-sectional survey. Rheumatology (Oxford) 44, 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumtology/keh436 (2005).
Jacobsen, S., Sonne-Holm, S., Soballe, K., Gebuhr, P. & Lund, B. Hip dysplasia and osteoarthrosis: A survey of 4151 subjects from the osteoarthrosis substudy of the Copenhagen City heart study. Acta Orthop. 76, 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016470510030517 (2005).
Novais, E. N. et al. Do radiographic parameters of dysplasia improve to normal ranges after Bernese Periacetabular osteotomy?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 475, 1120–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5077-8 (2017).
Ahmad, S. S. et al. Survival of the dysplastic hip after periacetabular osteotomy: A meta-analysis. HIP Int. 33(2), 306–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/11207000211048425 (2021).
Clohisy, J. C. et al. Patient-reported outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy from the prospective ANCHOR cohort study. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 99, 33–41. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00798 (2017).
Konin, G. P. & Walz, D. M. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae: Classification, imaging findings, and clinical relevance. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 31, 1778–1786. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2036 (2010).
Castellvi, A. E., Goldstein, L. A. & Chan, D. P. Lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and their relationship with lumbar extradural defects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9, 493–495. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198407000-00014 (1984).
Sun, J. et al. The association of lumbosacral transitional vertebral anomalies with acetabular dysplasia in adult patients with hip-spine syndrome: A cross-sectional evaluation of a prospective hip registry cohort. Bone Jt. J. 103-B, 1351–1357 (2021).
Ganz, R., Klaue, K., Vinh, T. S. & Mast, J. W. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 232, 26–36 (1988).
Leopold, V. J. et al. Fixation stability and implant-associated complications in periacetabular osteotomy: A comparison of screw and K-wire fixation. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04112-7 (2021).
Tannast, M., Hanke, M. S., Zheng, G., Steppacher, S. D. & Siebenrock, K. A. What are the radiographic reference values for acetabular under- and overcoverage?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 473, 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-014-4038-3 (2015).
Siebenrock, K. A., Kistler, L., Schwab, J. M., Buchler, L. & Tannast, M. The acetabular wall index for assessing anteroposterior femoral head coverage in symptomatic patients. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 470, 3355–3360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2477-2 (2012).
Schwarz, T. et al. Assessment of pelvic tilt in anteroposterior radiographs by means of tilt ratios. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 138, 1045–1052. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-018-2931-z (2018).
Hou, L. et al. Lumbar plain radiograph is not reliable to identify lumbosacral transitional vertebra types according to Castellvi classification principle. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 21, 333. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03358-3 (2020).
Griffin, D. R., Parsons, N., Mohtadi, N. G., Safran, M. R. & Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research, N. A short version of the international hip outcome tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice. Arthroscopy 28, 611–616 (2012).
Krueger, D. R., Leopold, V. J., Schroeder, J. H., Perka, C. & Hardt, S. Correlation of the subjective hip value with validated patient-reported outcome measurements for the hip. J. Clin. Med. 9, 2179 (2020).
Giori, N. J. & Trousdale, R. T. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 417, 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000093014.90435.64 (2003).
Anderson, L. A., Anderson, M. B., Erickson, J. A., Chrastil, J. & Peters, C. L. Acetabular wall indices help to distinguish acetabular coverage in asymptomatic adults with varying morphologies. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 475, 1027–1033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-016-5055-1 (2017).
Schwarz, T. J. et al. Three-dimensional acetabular orientation during periacetabular osteotomy: A video analysis of acetabular rim position using an external fixator as navigation tool during reorientation procedure. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 142, 381–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03632-y (2022).
Dandachli, W., Islam, S. U., Richards, R., Hall-Craggs, M. & Witt, J. The influence of pelvic tilt on acetabular orientation and cover: A three-dimensional computerised tomography analysis. HIP Int. 23(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.5301/HIP.2013.10715 (2013).
Stetzelberger, V. M. et al. The acetabular wall index is associated with long-term conversion to THA after PAO. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 479, 1052–1065. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000001641 (2021).
Goronzy, J. et al. Acetabular- and femoral orientation after periacetabular osteotomy as a predictor for outcome and osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 21, 846. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03878-y (2020).
Fujii, M., Nakashima, Y., Sato, T., Akiyama, M. & Iwamoto, Y. Acetabular tilt correlates with acetabular version and coverage in hip dysplasia. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 470, 2827–2835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2370-z (2012).
Wells, J. et al. Intermediate-term hip survivorship and patient-reported outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy: The washington university experience. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 100, 218–225. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00337 (2018).
Tachibana, T., Fujii, M., Kitamura, K., Nakamura, T. & Nakashima, Y. Does acetabular coverage vary between the supine and standing positions in patients with hip dysplasia?. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 477, 2455–2466. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000898 (2019).
Verhaegen, J. C. F. et al. Prevalence of lumbosacral transitional vertebral anomalies among healthy volunteers and patients with hip pathology: Association with spinopelvic characteristics. JBJS Open Access 8, e2200095. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.Oa.22.00095 (2023).
Fan, Y. et al. The association the patient-reported outcomes after periacetabular osteotomy with radiographic features: A short-term retrospective study. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 16, 718. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02858-9 (2021).
Holleyman, R. et al. Periacetabular osteotomy for developmental dysplasia of the hip and femoroacetabular impingement: A study using the U.K. non-arthroplasty hip registry (NAHR) data set. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 102, 1312–1320. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.18.01387 (2020).
Nwachukwu, B. U. et al. How should we define clinically significant outcome improvement on the iHOT-12?. HSS J. 15, 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-018-9646-0 (2019).
Nazaroff, J., Mark, B., Learned, J. & Wang, D. Measurement of acetabular wall indices: Comparison between CT and plain radiography. J. Hip Preserv. Surg. 8, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnab008 (2021).
Vuillemin, N., Meier, M. K., Moosmann, A. M., Siebenrock, K. A. & Steppacher, S. D. Retrotilt of the pelvis during periacetabular osteotomy: How to avoid a systematic error resulting in acetabular retroversion and possible femoroacetabular impingement. Am. J. Sports Med. 51, 1224–1233. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231155201 (2023).
Leopold, V. J. et al. Fixation stability and implant-associated complications in periacetabular osteotomy: A comparison of screw and K-wire fixation. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 143, 691–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04112-7 (2023).
|
Sources 2/ https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-37208-8 The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article |
What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online
LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos
to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]
 |
 |
 |
