Connect with us

Health

Limited public knowledge of chronic kidney disease in resour

Limited public knowledge of chronic kidney disease in resour

 


Background

Awareness of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) includes general knowledge, risk factors, and consequences owing to CKD.1,2 CKD is defined as an estimated or measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min/1.73m2 that persists for ≥three months with or without evidence of kidney damage or evidence of kidney damage with or without decreased GFR.3

Early detection and management of CKD can help to improve disease outcomes. However, nearly all CKD conditions were clinically unfamiliar, owing to a lack of public awareness about the disease.4 A lack of general knowledge about the disease is a barrier to the successful implementation of prevention programs.5 According to a study conducted in the United States on 676 patients with CKD, more than one-third of patients know little about their CKD diagnosis, and nearly half are unaware of treatment options if their kidneys fail.6 In Ethiopia, there has been a shift in the last few decades from infectious disease to non-communicable chronic disease.7

Poor glycemic control, uncontrolled hypertension, nephrotoxin drugs, and smoking are recognized as the leading risk factors for CKD worldwide.8,9 Between 1990 and 2010, the prevalence of CKD raised from 29th to 18th on the list of leading causes of death worldwide.10 A large Chinese study discovered a 10.8% prevalence of CKD, but only 12.5% of them were aware of their condition.11

There is widespread agreement that CKD prevention is the best health policy option for lowering the costs associated with a better health outcome from this disease, particularly in developing countries like Ethiopia.12 As a result, raising public awareness about CKD and its risk factors is generating a lot of interest in CKD prevention strategies. In contrast, a lack of knowledge about CKD and its risk factors could hamper prevention and health promotion efforts.

Information on public knowledge of CKD is critical for understanding the knowledge gap and planning various educational interventions. Previous work in Ethiopia, on the other hand, has only focused on aspects of CKD prevention and has failed to address public knowledge. As a result, this cross-sectional study was carried out in order to evaluate public awareness and answer the fallacy areas in the population. The study’s findings will help in identifying knowledge gaps, planning educational sessions, facilitating screening programs in the community, and preventing the occurrence of CKD. Therefore, the current study aimed to assess public knowledge of CKD in the Ethiopian community using a validated tool.

Methods

Study Design and Setting

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Addis Ababa, which is the capital of Ethiopia. The city is administratively divided into ten sub-cities. However, it is believed that this figure was incorrectly recorded and understated the city’s population. The city has seen a robust annual growth rate in recent years, and population counts as of 2017 are approaching 4 million. The most recent census was scheduled for the fiscal year 2018–2019, after being postponed due to security concerns in 2017 and 2018 (CSA, 2017).

Participant Recruitment

The target population of this study was lay public, and health professionals were excluded from the study. Each sub-city had a proportional number of study participants based on its total population size. Convenience sampling was used to collect data from all ten sub-cities until we had a representative sample from each. Each study participant provided written or verbal consent based on their educational status. The Institutional Review Board approved the verbal informed consent process for participants whose education level prevented them from signing written consent.

Study Instrument

To collect data from study participants, a paper-based self-administered and interviewer-administered questionnaire was used. The data collection tool was developed after a thorough review of the literature. The survey was designed in English, then translated into Amharic and back to English to ensure that the final version conveyed the intended meaning. For data collection, an Amharic version of the questionnaire was used. The survey instrument was pretested on 25 Addis Ababa residents who were not included in the final analysis, and minor changes were made to the final data collection tool. The final questionnaire is divided into six sections, with survey questions on Kidney and CKD knowledge classified into three categories (True, False, and I do not know).

Data Collection

Data collection was carried out by two data collectors (one Bsc nurse and one BPharm). The principal investigators provided data collectors with a half-day training on the data collection instrument and ethics issues. The data was collected between September and November of 2018.

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using the statistical package for social science (SPSS) version 26. To describe the responses of participants, frequencies, tables, percentage, mean, interquartile range (IQR), and standard deviation (S.D.) were used. To identify factors associated with public knowledge of CKD, an independent T-test and one-way ANOVA statistics were used, a p-value <0.05 were considered as a significant association. When the correct answer for the specific question is correct, the response of the study participants was rated as True = 1, False = 0, and I do not know = 0. Otherwise, when the correct answer is False, it is coded as True = 0, False = 1, and I do not know = 0.

Results

A total of 350 individuals were approached, 301 of whom completed and returned the questionnaire, giving a response rate of 86%. The mean (S.D.) age of study participants was 33.03 (±10.05) years, and it ranged from 18 to 65 years. Almost equal number of male (48.2%) and female (51.8%) respondents represented the study. More than one-quarter of respondents completed secondary school (28.9%) and were unemployed (29.9%), respectively. The majority of the respondents were single (58.1%).

Of the total 301 participants, forty (13.3%) of them had a familial history of CKD, and less than five percent of respondents had a personal history of stroke (3.7%). Remarkably, eighty percent of the participants were free from any medical condition that requires medication at the time of the study. Among the study participants 10.6%, 7.6% and 7.0% of them had hypertension, diabetes and heart attack, respectively. In this study, the majority of participants live in the house of five and above (54.5%) (see Table 1).

Table 1 Socio-Demographic Characteristics of Study Participants (n=301)

In this study, the mean (S.D.) knowledge score of participants was 11.12 (±4.21) with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 22. Concerning the distribution of CKD knowledge score, half of the respondents score 11 and less. The majority of the participants are aware that kidney makes urine (72.8%) and clean blood (67.8%). More than half of the participants identified that diabetes (57.8%) and hypertension (51.8%) are the risk factors for CKD. However, only one-fourth of the participants knew that being female has got nothing to do with increasing the risk of CKD (25.2%). A significant number of respondents knew that urine test help to determine kidney health (87.7%). More than half of the respondents recognized that certain medications could help in lowering the progression of CKD (57.5%) (see Table 2).

Table 2 Number (Percentage) of the Correct Response to Individual Items on the Questionnaire by Respondents (n=301)

One-way ANOVA was employed to test significant association between socio-demographic characteristics and knowledge score. The analysis revealed that educational level and family history of CKD had a significant effect on knowledge of CKD. Respondents who had an educational background of degree had relatively higher knowledge scores than the other category participants (P-value= 0.015). Similarly, study participants with family history of CKD had increased knowledge mean score than their counter parts (P-value= 0.001). Independent t-test was also performed but failed to reveal any association between socio-demographic characteristics and knowledge score (see Table 3).

Table 3 Relationship Between Socio-Demographic Characteristics and Mean Knowledge Score

Discussion

An important aspect of health literacy is knowledge of disease and risk factors.13–16 The purpose of this study was to assess the general public’s knowledge of chronic disease. CKD is a significant health concern in Ethiopia, and despite the lack of national data, hospital-based assessments revealed a higher magnitude of CKD.17 Consequently, the study’s findings would be an important input for policymakers and program managers looking into appropriate intervention.

The computed mean (S.D.) knowledge score was found to be 11.2 (±4.21), which is comparable to the findings reported from Australia and Tanzania, which were 10.34 (±5.0) and 3.85 (±4.66), respectively.5,13 The current findings revealed that educational level had a significant effect on knowledge of CKD, with a P-value of 0.015. Because the study was conducted in the country’s capital, this finding would not be representative; thus, the literacy rate of the Ethiopian population is less than 50%, and only 20.4% of the population lives in the urban areas.18 Similarly, in this study, respondents with a family history of CKD had a higher mean score of CKD knowledge, which was in line with other studies.5,11,13

Regarding general knowledge of study participants on CKD, 83.7% of the study participants knew that a person could lead a healthy life with one healthy kidney; this was slightly lower in comparison to Hong Kong study.11 However, the finding of the current study is also promising since organ shortage is a global crisis and the public knowledge and awareness is a crucial element for promoting the living organ donation practice.19 As a developing country, the level of awareness claimed in this study is substantial. A lower number of a study respondent (22.6%) believes that herbal supplements can be useful in treating CKD. However, 2/3rd of the participant from Tanzania study claimed that they were likely to use traditional medicines for the treatment of kidney disease and also around 14% of use self-treatment with home remedies.13 A study from Nigeria revealed that 47.8% of respondents have faith in local herbal concoctions and spiritual means to cure CKD.10

In the present study, more than half (57.5%) of the study participants knew that certain medications could help to slow down the worsening of CKD, which was lower in comparison to Hong Kong study (80%). In the previously mentioned study, half of the study group had a risk factor for CKD such as diabetes and hypertension11 that may increase their awareness towards risk factor for CKD. With current evidence, expanding health education to prevent CKD is indispensable, since there are several treatment options that are able to render the progression of CKD by preventing the advance in risk factor.20 Most participants knew that the kidney makes urine and kidney clean blood, but around 21 and 34% of the participants identified that the kidney helps to maintain blood pressure and keep bones healthy, respectively. Likewise, in Hong Kong study, nearly half of the study participants did not know the role of the kidney in maintaining blood pressure.11 Therefore, health education focusing on chronic disease prevention and management is critical; there is an increase in the prevalence of chronic disease in Ethiopia, particularly in urban settings; as a result, policymakers and health care strategists should pay close attention.21

The majority of the study respondents knew that hypertension (51.8%) and diabetes (57.8%) are the risk factors for the development of CKD. This finding is similar to several studies elsewhere.10–12 About signs and symptoms of an advanced stage of CKD, 68.8% of recognized water retention is one of the advanced stage symptoms, nausea and vomiting (39.5%), loss of appetite (56.6%) and increased fatigue (75.7%). This finding depicted that participants had good knowledge of alarming signs and symptoms of CKD in comparison to previously reported results.5,10 This would help implement prevention strategies and management of a communicable disease.

Similar to other studies, public knowledge of CKD is significantly associated with the level of education. Several other studies reported that the level of education is significantly associated with knowledge related to CKD.5,10,11 Since health literacy is highly associated with personal determinants like knowledge and competence, this variation is the expected.14 This study assessed the public knowledge of CKD for the first time in Ethiopia, and it produced useful findings that serve as an input for health education programs at the community level, in health facilities and media sector. Furthermore, the findings serve as an input for in-service and pre-service training of health professionals in Ethiopia. As a limitation, we recruited participants only from the capital city of the country and further studies focusing on the rural base of the country will be needed.

Conclusion

The general knowledge level of the Ethiopian population about CKD and its risk factors is low. Currently, non-communicable diseases such as diabetes and hypertension have become a public concern. Those are one of the significant risk factors for CKD. Future public awareness programs should be more targeted toward patients with CKD risk factors and communities with low educational level.

Abbreviations

CKD, chronic kidney disease; GFR: glomerular filtration rate; IQR: interquartile range.

Data Sharing Statement

The data sets analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participation

The ethics review committee approved the study of the school of pharmacy, Ambo University. The current study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, before initiation of the study, written or verbal informed consent was obtained from all of the participants. The Institutional Review Board approved the verbal informed consent process for participants whose education level prevented them from signing written consent.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the support of the School of Pharmacy, Ambo University. The authors would like to thank the study participants for their willingness to participate in the current study.

Funding

No financial support was gained to conduct the study.

Disclosure

The authors declared no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Gray NA, Kapojos JJ, Burke MT, Sammartino C, Clark CJ. Patient kidney disease knowledge remains inadequate with standard nephrology outpatient care. Clin Kidney J. 2016;9(1):113–118.

2. Plantinga LC, Tuot DS, Powe NR. Awareness of Chronic Kidney Disease Among Patients and Providers. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2010;17(3):225–236. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2010.03.002.

3. Mathew T. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Management in 260 General Practice. Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Management in General Practice; 2015:1–56.

4. Goro KK, Wolide AD, Dibaba FK, et al. Patient Awareness, Prevalence, and Risk Factors of Chronic Kidney Disease among Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertensive Patients at Jimma University Medical Center, Ethiopia. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:1–8.

5. Gheewala PA, Peterson GM, Zaidi STR, Jose MD, Castelino RL. Public knowledge of chronic kidney disease evaluated using a validated questionnaire. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(371):1–12.

6. Wright JA, Wallston KA, Easy TA, Alp T, Cavanaugh KL. Development and Results of a Kidney Disease Knowledge Survey Given to Patients With CKD. NIH Public Access. 2012;57(3):387–395.

7. Begashaw B, Tessema F, Gesesew HA. Health Care Seeking Behavior in Southwest Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2016;11(9):1–13.

8. Webster AC, Nagler EV, Morton RL, Masson P. Chronic Kidney Disease. Elsevier Ltd; 2017:1238–1252.

9. White SL, Cass A, Shaw J, Heart B. Limited knowledge of kidney disease in a survey of AusDiab study participants. MJA. 2008;188:204–208.

10. Oluyombo R, Ayodele O, Akinwusi P, et al. awareness, knowledge and perception of chronic kidney disease in a rural community of southwest Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2016;19(2):161–169.

11. Chow KM, Szeto CC, Kwan BCH, Leung CB, Li PKT. Public lacks knowledge on chronic kidney disease. Hong Kong Med J. 2014;20(2):139–144.

12. Roomizadeh P, Taheri D, Abedini A, Mortazavi M, Larry M, Mehdikhani B. Limited knowledge of chronic kidney disease and its main risk factors among Iranian 284 community. Int J Heal Policy Manag. 2014;2(4):161–166.

13. Stanifer JW, Turner EL, Egger JR, et al. Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Associated with Chronic Kidney Disease in Northern Tanzania. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):1–14.

14. Sørensen K, Van den Broucke S, Fullam J, et al. Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):80.

15. Poureslami I, Nimmon L, Rootman I, Fitzgerald MJ. Health literacy and chronic disease management: drawing from expert knowledge to set an agenda. Health Promot Int. 2016;32(4):743–754.

16. Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Peel J, Baker DW. Health literacy and knowledge of chronic disease. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;51(3):267–275.

17. Kore C, Tadesse A, Teshome B, Daniel K, Kassa A. The magnitude of chronic kidney disease and its risk factors at Zewditu Memorial Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. J Nephrol Ther. 2018;8(3):313.

18. Indexmundi, 2018. Ethiopia Demographics Profile. Available from: https://www.indexmundi.com/ethiopia/demographics_profile.html. Accessed 26 November, 2019.

19. Abouna GM. Organ shortage crisis: problems and possible solutions. Transplant Proc. 2008;40(1):34–38.

20. Jaber BL, Madias NE. Progression of chronic kidney disease: can it be prevented or arrested? Am J Med. 2005;118(12):1323–1330.

21. Shiferaw F, Letebo M, Misganaw A, et al. Non-communicable Diseases in Ethiopia: disease burden, gaps in health care delivery and strategic directions. Ethiopian J Health Dev. 2018;32(3):6.

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://www.dovepress.com/limited-public-knowledge-of-chronic-kidney-disease-in-a-resource-limit-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJGM

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]