Connect with us

Politics

Hush Money: How a porn star scandal led to Trump's first criminal trial

Hush Money: How a porn star scandal led to Trump's first criminal trial

 


NEW YORK (AP) It was the kind of sordid story Donald Trump might have appreciated before politics: a porn actor claiming they had sex.

But on the eve of the 2016 presidential election, Trump feared that the story, which he called false, would cost him votes. So, prosecutors say, he arranged to pay Stormy Daniels to keep quiet.

Now, after years of back-and-forth before his indictment last year, Trump is scheduled to go on trial Monday in New York on state charges linked to the sex scandal he and his aides tried to cover up. hide.

Barring last-minute delays, this will be the first of Trump's four criminal cases to go to trial. This will be an unprecedented event in American history: the first criminal trial of a former president.

It wasn't always clear that the hush money allegations would even lead to charges, much less that they would be the first to go to trial. It is arguably Trump's least perilous indictment, with others involving government secrets and threats to democracy.

Yet it is almost certain to be the most salacious, with expected testimony about allegations of marital infidelity, a supermarket tabloid's complicity in a cover-up, and payments orchestrated by a former Trump loyalist who now counts himself among the enemies of the ex-president.

Many details of the case have been made public since 2018, when federal prosecutors charged Trump's ex-lawyer Michael Cohen with campaign finance crimes in connection with a scheme to not only bury allegations of Daniel, but also other potentially damaging stories from Trump's playboy past.

They then implicated Trump as directing Cohen's efforts, indirectly identifying him in court documents as Individual-1. Justice Department policy prohibits charging a sitting president with a crime, and nothing has come of it.

In the years since, the saga of sex, politics and cover-ups has largely faded from the headlines, overshadowed by an investigation into Russian election interference, Trump's two impeachments and allegations that he plotted to overturn his 2020 election and allegedly hoarded classified documents after leaving office.

Former Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. reviewed the circumstances of a $130,000 payment Cohen made to Daniels and declined to take the politically explosive step of seeking the indictment of Trump.

The prosecutor's office was so uncertain about the hush money case that it became known among prosecutors as the zombie case. They would revisit it, then abandon it again as they pursued Trump on multiple fronts over the past five years, twice going to the Supreme Court to obtain his tax records and suing his company and a top executive for tax fraud.

Vance's successor, Alvin Bragg, a Democrat who took office in January 2022, saw the monetary silence affair differently.

The grand jury convened in January 2023. It heard from Cohen, now an outspoken critic of his ex-boss, and other witnesses, including the former editor of the National Enquirer tabloid, who helped Trump by buying stories negative and aggressively removing them. practice known as catch-and-kill.

On March 30, 2023, the grand jury voted to indict Trump for falsifying his company's internal records to conceal the true nature of payments made to Cohen to reimburse him for his work in potentially covering up stories. embarrassing. The charges are misdemeanors punishable by up to four years in prison, although there is no guarantee that a conviction would result in prison time.

Trump denies the allegations, saying it is prosecutors who are engaging in election interference and a witch hunt. He pleaded not guilty.

In a court filing, Braggs' office framed the lawsuits as another case of Trump's election interference, accusing the Republican of orchestrating a vast, corrupt criminal scheme to cover up damaging voter information and undermine the integrity of the 2016 presidential election.

In charging documents, prosecutors talked about a multi-part scheme dating back to the early days of the 2016 Trump campaign to suppress stories alleging he had extramarital sex.

Before Daniels' payment, prosecutors said, Cohen arranged for the National Enquirer to pay $150,000 to former Playboy model Karen McDougal, who claimed she had a months-long affair with Trump. The tabloid also paid $30,000 to a Trump Tower doorman who claimed to have a story about a child Trump had out of wedlock.

Trump, shaken by the October surprise of the never-before-released 2005 Access Hollywood tape in which he bragged about grabbing women's genitals, then ordered Cohen to arrange payment to Daniels, who was campaigning to advance his claims that they had a sexual relationship during a 2006 celebrity golf outing in Lake Tahoe, California, according to the indictment.

Trump's impeachment, five days after the indictment, was a spectacle drawing hordes of media, supporters and protesters. His trial will take place in the same courtroom and in the same cauldron.

After Trump was indicted in New York, others quickly followed.

Within 70 days, special counsel Jack Smith accused Trump in Florida of keeping classified documents at his Mar-a-Lago estate. Fifty-four days later, Smith accused Trump in Washington of trying to overturn the 2020 election in the lead-up to the January 6, 2021, insurrection. Two weeks later, Atlanta's Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis , accused Trump of racketeering and other charges in a similar election subversion case.

As the New York case moves at a rapid pace, Trump's other criminal cases appear increasingly unlikely to go to trial before the November election.

The Atlanta case was slowed by allegations of impropriety against the attorney general, the Washington case by a Supreme Court appeal on a legally unverified immunity issue, and the Florida indictment by a series of unresolved queries.

That's partly simply because there are fewer practical obstacles to moving the case forward, and perhaps to some extent it's a simpler case, Alex Reinert said , professor at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law in New York.

Trump also repeatedly tried to delay the New York trial. His lawyers were rejected three times this week as they tried to get a state appeals court to postpone the case.

In its allegations of high payments intended to cover up a sexual affair that occurred during an election year, the case has some telling parallels with the Justice Department's unsuccessful prosecution of former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards. He was charged with campaign finance crimes in connection with nearly $1 million secretly provided by two wealthy donors who helped hide his pregnant mistress during the 2008 Democratic presidential primary.

Defense attorneys argued the money was intended to conceal the affair from his wife and not to increase his chances of election. Edwards was ultimately acquitted of one count while the jury deadlocked on five other counts.

Jeremy Saland, a former Manhattan assistant district attorney who now works as a criminal defense attorney, said that because of the size of the case, Bragg must believe he has a better chance of winning against Trump.

He must go into the courtroom thinking he has the assets, Saland said. Otherwise, for the American psyche, it could be catastrophic for a former president to be prosecuted in a case that ultimately falls flat and, even if not true, appears to be a sham.

But he added that if the allegations were proven, it would still constitute serious misconduct by someone who was vying at the time to become leader of the free world. For those who say, “Come on, it's just silence,” he said he believes we hold our elected officials to higher standards and subject them to greater scrutiny, and rightly so.

__ Tucker reported from Washington.

Sources

1/ https://Google.com/

2/ https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-michael-cohen-stormy-daniels-e40532d3bce7768e296fdaf9591ef05b

The mention sources can contact us to remove/changing this article

What Are The Main Benefits Of Comparing Car Insurance Quotes Online

LOS ANGELES, CA / ACCESSWIRE / June 24, 2020, / Compare-autoinsurance.Org has launched a new blog post that presents the main benefits of comparing multiple car insurance quotes. For more info and free online quotes, please visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/the-advantages-of-comparing-prices-with-car-insurance-quotes-online/ The modern society has numerous technological advantages. One important advantage is the speed at which information is sent and received. With the help of the internet, the shopping habits of many persons have drastically changed. The car insurance industry hasn't remained untouched by these changes. On the internet, drivers can compare insurance prices and find out which sellers have the best offers. View photos The advantages of comparing online car insurance quotes are the following: Online quotes can be obtained from anywhere and at any time. Unlike physical insurance agencies, websites don't have a specific schedule and they are available at any time. Drivers that have busy working schedules, can compare quotes from anywhere and at any time, even at midnight. Multiple choices. Almost all insurance providers, no matter if they are well-known brands or just local insurers, have an online presence. Online quotes will allow policyholders the chance to discover multiple insurance companies and check their prices. Drivers are no longer required to get quotes from just a few known insurance companies. Also, local and regional insurers can provide lower insurance rates for the same services. Accurate insurance estimates. Online quotes can only be accurate if the customers provide accurate and real info about their car models and driving history. Lying about past driving incidents can make the price estimates to be lower, but when dealing with an insurance company lying to them is useless. Usually, insurance companies will do research about a potential customer before granting him coverage. Online quotes can be sorted easily. Although drivers are recommended to not choose a policy just based on its price, drivers can easily sort quotes by insurance price. Using brokerage websites will allow drivers to get quotes from multiple insurers, thus making the comparison faster and easier. For additional info, money-saving tips, and free car insurance quotes, visit https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ Compare-autoinsurance.Org is an online provider of life, home, health, and auto insurance quotes. This website is unique because it does not simply stick to one kind of insurance provider, but brings the clients the best deals from many different online insurance carriers. In this way, clients have access to offers from multiple carriers all in one place: this website. On this site, customers have access to quotes for insurance plans from various agencies, such as local or nationwide agencies, brand names insurance companies, etc. "Online quotes can easily help drivers obtain better car insurance deals. All they have to do is to complete an online form with accurate and real info, then compare prices", said Russell Rabichev, Marketing Director of Internet Marketing Company. CONTACT: Company Name: Internet Marketing CompanyPerson for contact Name: Gurgu CPhone Number: (818) 359-3898Email: [email protected]: https://compare-autoinsurance.Org/ SOURCE: Compare-autoinsurance.Org View source version on accesswire.Com:https://www.Accesswire.Com/595055/What-Are-The-Main-Benefits-Of-Comparing-Car-Insurance-Quotes-Online View photos

ExBUlletin

to request, modification Contact us at Here or [email protected]