what’s happening
Last week, the Trump administration announced a program that dramatically speeded up the process of creating a coronavirus vaccine through a project called Operation Warp Speed. While containment efforts such as social distances and strong testing regimes help limit the spread of the virus, experts say that a pandemic is really behind us until the wider population is immunized through the vaccine. I admit it is not in.
Despite the urgency, vaccine production is a slow and painstaking process. With over 90 vaccines in development around the world, only a handful are in the early stages of human trials. The most optimistic forecast is that it will take at least 1 to 18 months before the vaccine becomes widely available. It may seem slow, but it will actually break the record for the fastest vaccine ever developed.
Some scientists have proposed controversial steps that could shave months from that timeline. In order to test the vaccine more quickly, we deliberately expose people to the coronavirus.
Related: Watch the first round of the Coronavirus Vaccine Trial in Washington:
Vaccines are usually tested by giving a dose to a subject and letting them return to their normal lives assuming that a certain number of viruses will come in contact with the virus. This process can take a long time for coronaviruses, especially given the steps to avoid infections that are part of our typical daily routine. Exposing the subject to the virus (the so-called “human challenge trial”) eliminates that waiting time.
Why there is discussion
The Human Challenge Trial is rare because it is considered a violation of core medical principles. Exposing people to the virus will necessarily mean that some of them may get sick or even die.
Supporters of using challenge trials to develop coronavirus vaccines say the current pandemic challenges that logic. They claim that thousands of people are likely to die if the vaccines are delayed by several months before they hit the market, far outweighing the potential drawbacks of the challenge trials.
Defenders say that exposing subjects to weaker versions of the virus and selecting volunteers from less vulnerable groups, such as young adults, can dramatically reduce the health risk to subjects. A key element is the consent of those involved in the trial. Proponents say that if individuals are willing to take the risk of exposure to help save the lives of potentially thousands, they should be allowed to do so. As of Monday, more than 10,000 volunteers are on the website set up to collect the names of those who are willing to take part in the challenge trial.
The idea has received a great deal of backlash from scientists, who know little about the virus and how it works, so it’s not possible to measure how much risk a participant is at. Claims to be possible. It is also skeptical about the applicability of the challenge trial results, which consist of young and healthy subjects, to a wider population.
Others are concerned about the logistics of conducting such a trial, especially if several vaccines are being tested simultaneously. Some of those vaccines will inevitably fail. This means that all subjects are at risk without any protection. Challenge trials also face the inherent hurdles experts say that they may take even longer than traditional methods, such as determining the correct form and amount of virus to expose the subject.
What’s next
Challenge testing in the United States cannot be initiated without the approval of the Food and Drug Administration. A group of 35 members of parliament recently sent a letter urging the FDA to acknowledge the urgency of the pandemic and allow it to proceed with future trials. With only a few vaccines in the early stages of human trials, it can take months before any of them are ready for large-scale trials of any kind.
Outlook
Supporter
The sooner the vaccine is prepared, the more lives it will save
“Covid-19 is currently killing thousands of people a day. The vast majority of the world’s population has not acquired immunity to the disease, and the economy is heading to a halt to curb its spread. It’s shattering. Given the tragic situation, slightly accelerating the spread of the vaccine is incredibly valuable and requires more attention and more extreme measures. ”—Matthew Iglesias, Vox
We should not disturb those who are willing to take risks for greater benefit
“When healthy volunteers well informed about risk are willing to support the fight against a pandemic by supporting promising research, there is a moral reason to gratefully accept their help. Doing so will implicitly still expose others to significant risk. ”— Peter Singer and Richard Yetter Chappell, Washington Post
It may actually be safer to participate in a challenge trial
“By the time vaccine candidates are being tested, there may be some therapies that have proven to be effective, and indeed, the brave volunteers we recruit will have immediate access to them. It should be guaranteed that the dramatic exposure of healthy volunteers to the virus will lower the net risk than expected. For some, waiting for possible infections It may be weirdly safe to participate in a study rather than rely on a general health care system. ”—Bioethicist Nir Eyal Nature
There is a moral obligation to pursue every possible course for developing a vaccine
“ It is irreversible to simultaneously limit the ability of heroes who are willing to help save lives and accelerate their return to normality and prosperity at the same time, especially when the government urgently blocks freedom to stop the spread of COVID-19. It may even be evil to prevent patriarchal altruists from volunteering for good faith. ”— Conor Friedersdorf, Atlantic Ocean
The trial is done ethically
“I think people are worried.” Will they do this for prisoners and the poor? “No. I’m not claiming a suspension of ethical rules regarding methods. We may argue that the risks / benefits we face justify providing an opportunity, but no one is forced, deceived, or exploited. ”— Bioethicist’s Arthur Kaplan Vice
Skeptics
You don’t know enough about the virus to be safe
“If you knowingly infect someone with the virus, you really want to understand the disease and understand that what you’re doing is a reasonable risk.” — Immunologist Matthew Memory Science
Results may not be applicable to the wider population
“We just know that it works in healthy young adults, perhaps in a very narrow age …. and it’s extrapolable to the mortal population, the population of the 60s, 70s, and 80s. It may or may not be informational. ”—Infectious Disease Expert Myron Levine STAT
Intensive exams may use too many resources
“Because of the rapidly growing number of vaccine candidates, such challenge trials may not be possible with all proposed agents. Each vaccination trial requires hundreds of people to be quarantined for weeks.” Would deprive the hospital of the resources available to treat normal COVID-19 patients. ”— Chris Smith, New York Post
Challenge trial violates core medical principles
“Challenge trials against viruses that are not as deadly as cures as coronaviruses will be a radical departure from the precedent. Even if all volunteers are young and healthy It does not completely reduce the risk of disease. ”— Peter Sullivan, The hill
Challenge trials may not be fast
“I’m sure I can accelerate these timelines, but it’s still not easy to do this very quickly. That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do it. It helps, but I don’t know how it happens so quickly. “—Vaccine expert Peter Hotes BuzzFeed News
Are there any topics you would like us to cover in The 360? Please send suggestions to [email protected].
